<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 18 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257082</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the petition by quashing the assessment order, demand notice, and show cause notice for penalty. However, the notice seeking to reopen the assessment was not disturbed, allowing for further inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The petitioners were granted the opportunity to present their case, with the court emphasizing that the reasons for the notice would be subject to scrutiny during reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 07:18:50 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 18 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257082</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the petition by quashing the assessment order, demand notice, and show cause notice for penalty. However, the notice seeking to reopen the assessment was not disturbed, allowing for further inquiry during reassessment proceedings. The petitioners were granted the opportunity to present their case, with the court emphasizing that the reasons for the notice would be subject to scrutiny during reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257082</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>