<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (3) TMI 16 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257080</link>
    <description>The Court held that the assessment order for A.Y. 1998-1999 was invalid as no notice was issued under Section 143(2) of the I.T. Act, emphasizing the mandatory nature of such notice for scrutiny assessment. The Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, stating that since the first issue was decided in their favor, the assessment proceedings could not be maintained. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal in favor of the Assessee, modifying the judgment with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2015 09:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377708" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (3) TMI 16 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257080</link>
      <description>The Court held that the assessment order for A.Y. 1998-1999 was invalid as no notice was issued under Section 143(2) of the I.T. Act, emphasizing the mandatory nature of such notice for scrutiny assessment. The Court ruled in favor of the Assessee, stating that since the first issue was decided in their favor, the assessment proceedings could not be maintained. Consequently, the Court allowed the appeal in favor of the Assessee, modifying the judgment with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257080</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>