<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Amendment in Sec.32O</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108139</link>
    <description>The amendment removes obsolete textual references in two disqualification clauses so that phrases referring to earlier transitional sub sections are omitted as redundant, aligning the disqualification provision with the current eligibility regime and eliminating vestigial phrasing that no longer affects whether an applicant may approach the Settlement Commission.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2015 23:57:29 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 15:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377660" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Amendment in Sec.32O</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108139</link>
      <description>The amendment removes obsolete textual references in two disqualification clauses so that phrases referring to earlier transitional sub sections are omitted as redundant, aligning the disqualification provision with the current eligibility regime and eliminating vestigial phrasing that no longer affects whether an applicant may approach the Settlement Commission.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2015 23:57:29 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=108139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>