https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257064 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled in favor of the Appellant, allowing the appeal as the extended period of payment was deemed not invokable since the correct service tax liability was reflected in the ST-3 returns. The Tribunal highlighted that providing accurate information in prescribed returns prevents the invocation of the extended period for service tax demand, ultimately leading to the appeal being allowed on the grounds of being time-barred. en-us Fri, 26 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Feb 2016 10:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257064 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT AHMEDABAD ruled in favor of the Appellant, allowing the appeal as the extended period of payment was deemed not invokable since the correct service tax liability was reflected in the ST-3 returns. The Tribunal highlighted that providing accurate information in prescribed returns prevents the invocation of the extended period for service tax demand, ultimately leading to the appeal being allowed on the grounds of being time-barred. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 26 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257064