<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1059 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257059</link>
    <description>In the absence of a statutory definition, the expression &quot;furniture&quot; in the Karnataka VAT Act was construed in its ordinary and commercial sense using the common parlance and predominant user tests. On that approach, articles ordinarily used for convenience or decoration in a dwelling or business place may qualify as furniture, but work stations designed to house and operate computers and allied equipment are better understood as part of the work environment, not as furniture in popular understanding. Accordingly, work stations were held not to fall within Entry No. 5 of the Fifth Schedule, so the input tax restriction under Section 11(a)(2) did not apply and input tax deduction remained available.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 11:34:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1059 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257059</link>
      <description>In the absence of a statutory definition, the expression &quot;furniture&quot; in the Karnataka VAT Act was construed in its ordinary and commercial sense using the common parlance and predominant user tests. On that approach, articles ordinarily used for convenience or decoration in a dwelling or business place may qualify as furniture, but work stations designed to house and operate computers and allied equipment are better understood as part of the work environment, not as furniture in popular understanding. Accordingly, work stations were held not to fall within Entry No. 5 of the Fifth Schedule, so the input tax restriction under Section 11(a)(2) did not apply and input tax deduction remained available.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257059</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>