<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1056 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257056</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Proviso to Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, allowing recovery from a new owner, does not have retrospective effect. Therefore, arrears of Central Excise duty and penalty from the previous owner cannot be recovered from the present owner who acquired the factory before the provision&#039;s enactment. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision in favor of the respondent, based on legal analysis and precedents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2015 08:21:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377249" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1056 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257056</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Proviso to Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, allowing recovery from a new owner, does not have retrospective effect. Therefore, arrears of Central Excise duty and penalty from the previous owner cannot be recovered from the present owner who acquired the factory before the provision&#039;s enactment. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the decision in favor of the respondent, based on legal analysis and precedents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>