https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257055 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand on excess molasses clearance against the appellant, a sugar and molasses manufacturer. The decision highlighted the insufficiency of evidence to prove allegations of clandestine sugar production and clearance based solely on the dip reading method. The appellant's argument regarding the measurement method's inaccuracies during temperature fluctuations was considered valid, leading to the favorable outcome. The Tribunal emphasized the need for substantial evidence beyond the dip reading method to support such allegations, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and providing for consequential relief. en-us Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 05 Oct 2015 10:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257055 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the duty demand on excess molasses clearance against the appellant, a sugar and molasses manufacturer. The decision highlighted the insufficiency of evidence to prove allegations of clandestine sugar production and clearance based solely on the dip reading method. The appellant's argument regarding the measurement method's inaccuracies during temperature fluctuations was considered valid, leading to the favorable outcome. The Tribunal emphasized the need for substantial evidence beyond the dip reading method to support such allegations, ultimately ruling in favor of the appellant and providing for consequential relief. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257055