<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1053 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257053</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the order imposing the redemption fine and penalty on the co-appellant. It was held that redemption fine is not applicable when goods are not available for confiscation or cleared under bond. Additionally, if duty, interest, and penalty are fully paid by the main appellant, penalty on the co-appellant is not justified. The appeals were allowed, and the imposition of the redemption fine and penalty on the co-appellant was overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2015 08:21:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377246" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1053 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257053</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the order imposing the redemption fine and penalty on the co-appellant. It was held that redemption fine is not applicable when goods are not available for confiscation or cleared under bond. Additionally, if duty, interest, and penalty are fully paid by the main appellant, penalty on the co-appellant is not justified. The appeals were allowed, and the imposition of the redemption fine and penalty on the co-appellant was overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257053</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>