<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1050 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257050</link>
    <description>The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that royalties/license fees for imported Beta/Digibeta tapes are includable in the assessable value. The Tribunal found that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked as there was uncertainty in the legal position prior to a Supreme Court decision. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, noting the unclear legal position and lack of willful misstatement by the Assessee. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of clear legal guidelines and judicial precedents in tax law interpretation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2016 17:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377243" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1050 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257050</link>
      <description>The Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that royalties/license fees for imported Beta/Digibeta tapes are includable in the assessable value. The Tribunal found that the extended period of limitation could not be invoked as there was uncertainty in the legal position prior to a Supreme Court decision. The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision, noting the unclear legal position and lack of willful misstatement by the Assessee. The Court dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the importance of clear legal guidelines and judicial precedents in tax law interpretation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257050</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>