<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1049 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257049</link>
    <description>A cryptic appellate order that failed to address the assessee&#039;s substantive objections to export cess on menthol crystals was found inadequate for proper adjudication. The High Court noted that the Tribunal had not meaningfully examined whether menthol crystals fell within the statutory levy, nor the effect of repeal on the alleged liability to cess, interest and demand. Because the rival submissions on the core controversy were not dealt with in a reasoned manner, the order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law. The issue of levy itself was left open.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2015 16:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1049 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257049</link>
      <description>A cryptic appellate order that failed to address the assessee&#039;s substantive objections to export cess on menthol crystals was found inadequate for proper adjudication. The High Court noted that the Tribunal had not meaningfully examined whether menthol crystals fell within the statutory levy, nor the effect of repeal on the alleged liability to cess, interest and demand. Because the rival submissions on the core controversy were not dealt with in a reasoned manner, the order was set aside and the matter remanded to the Tribunal for fresh decision on merits and in accordance with law. The issue of levy itself was left open.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257049</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>