<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1039 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257039</link>
    <description>The court found that the Tribunal failed to properly address whether the brought forward depreciation loss could be set off against capital gains for the assessment year. Emphasizing the core issue of set-off under Section 32(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, the court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order. It directed a fresh consideration of all issues, including the applicability of the provision and relevant Supreme Court decisions, without awarding costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2015 08:15:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377232" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1039 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257039</link>
      <description>The court found that the Tribunal failed to properly address whether the brought forward depreciation loss could be set off against capital gains for the assessment year. Emphasizing the core issue of set-off under Section 32(2)(iii) of the Income Tax Act, the court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s order. It directed a fresh consideration of all issues, including the applicability of the provision and relevant Supreme Court decisions, without awarding costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257039</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>