<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1031 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257031</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the importance of consistency in tax assessments and ruled that the assessee, who began manufacturing in FY 2000-01, was entitled to the deduction for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, highlighting that initial conditions being met in the relevant year justified the deduction for subsequent years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2015 16:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1031 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257031</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, allowing the assessee&#039;s deduction under Section 80IB of the Income Tax Act. It emphasized the importance of consistency in tax assessments and ruled that the assessee, who began manufacturing in FY 2000-01, was entitled to the deduction for the Assessment Year 2009-10. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, highlighting that initial conditions being met in the relevant year justified the deduction for subsequent years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257031</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>