<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1030 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257030</link>
    <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision, granting the society conducting coaching classes for civil services examinations exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad). It ruled that the society&#039;s activities fell within the broader concept of &#039;education,&#039; including vocational training, making it eligible for exemption. The tribunal emphasized consistency in granting exemptions, disallowing the A.O.&#039;s denial based on narrow interpretations. Additionally, depreciation on capital assets was allowed, and the alternative claim for exemption under section 11 was deemed unnecessary. The tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, affirming the exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2022 18:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377223" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1030 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257030</link>
      <description>The tribunal upheld the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039; decision, granting the society conducting coaching classes for civil services examinations exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad). It ruled that the society&#039;s activities fell within the broader concept of &#039;education,&#039; including vocational training, making it eligible for exemption. The tribunal emphasized consistency in granting exemptions, disallowing the A.O.&#039;s denial based on narrow interpretations. Additionally, depreciation on capital assets was allowed, and the alternative claim for exemption under section 11 was deemed unnecessary. The tribunal dismissed the department&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection, affirming the exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257030</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>