https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257020 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, waiving the pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty until the appeal's disposal. The Tribunal found that the processed fabrics did not change identity, and the LDPE/HDPE process occurred at the principal company's premises. The stay application was allowed, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and supporting the applicant's contention that they followed the procedure under Rule 96D. en-us Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 28 Feb 2015 08:10:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257020 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the applicant, waiving the pre-deposit of duty, interest, and penalty until the appeal's disposal. The Tribunal found that the processed fabrics did not change identity, and the LDPE/HDPE process occurred at the principal company's premises. The stay application was allowed, overturning the Commissioner (Appeals) decision and supporting the applicant's contention that they followed the procedure under Rule 96D. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257020