https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168429 The court interpreted the nomination clause in a life insurance policy, determining that a nominee does not become the owner of the money but has the right to collect it. The court ruled in favor of the appellants, the widow and son of the deceased policyholder, entitling them to share the policy amount equally with the deceased's mother under the Travancore Nayar Act. The court ordered the respondent to pay the costs to the appellants. en-us Mon, 10 Oct 1960 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Feb 2015 18:28:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168429 The court interpreted the nomination clause in a life insurance policy, determining that a nominee does not become the owner of the money but has the right to collect it. The court ruled in favor of the appellants, the widow and son of the deceased policyholder, entitling them to share the policy amount equally with the deceased's mother under the Travancore Nayar Act. The court ordered the respondent to pay the costs to the appellants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 10 Oct 1960 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168429