<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1983 (12) TMI 319 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168426</link>
    <description>The court clarified that a nominee under section 39 of the Insurance Act, 1938, does not acquire a beneficial interest in the life insurance policy during the policyholder&#039;s lifetime. The nominee&#039;s role is limited to receiving the amount on behalf of the legal heirs, and the policy amount forms part of the policyholder&#039;s estate upon their death. The court overturned previous judgments that misinterpreted section 39 and ruled in favor of the legal heirs, entitling them to a share in the insurance amount and interest earned. The appeal was allowed, and the plaintiffs were granted a 1/3rd share each, with costs allocated accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377189" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1983 (12) TMI 319 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168426</link>
      <description>The court clarified that a nominee under section 39 of the Insurance Act, 1938, does not acquire a beneficial interest in the life insurance policy during the policyholder&#039;s lifetime. The nominee&#039;s role is limited to receiving the amount on behalf of the legal heirs, and the policy amount forms part of the policyholder&#039;s estate upon their death. The court overturned previous judgments that misinterpreted section 39 and ruled in favor of the legal heirs, entitling them to a share in the insurance amount and interest earned. The appeal was allowed, and the plaintiffs were granted a 1/3rd share each, with costs allocated accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 1983 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168426</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>