https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168423 The Supreme Court addressed Writ Petitions challenging the Constitution (Eighty Fifth) Amendment Act, 2001, related to promotion and seniority issues. The Court allowed implementation of Article 16(4A) for reserved category candidates, transferred cases to the High Court for review, and emphasized the need for a Constitution Bench hearing. Contempt Petitions and Appeals were dismissed, ensuring matters were handled expeditiously with a focus on constitutional provisions and High Court examination, following precedents set in the Nagaraj case. en-us Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 24 Nov 2015 21:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168423 The Supreme Court addressed Writ Petitions challenging the Constitution (Eighty Fifth) Amendment Act, 2001, related to promotion and seniority issues. The Court allowed implementation of Article 16(4A) for reserved category candidates, transferred cases to the High Court for review, and emphasized the need for a Constitution Bench hearing. Contempt Petitions and Appeals were dismissed, ensuring matters were handled expeditiously with a focus on constitutional provisions and High Court examination, following precedents set in the Nagaraj case. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Oct 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168423