<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (5) TMI 173 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168422</link>
    <description>Alienation of a minor&#039;s immovable property is valid only if the natural guardian acts for necessity or benefit and complies with the statutory requirement of prior court permission. A sale executed by the mother without such permission, and supported only by the father&#039;s attestation, could not be treated as a sale by the father as natural guardian. The record showed no reliable proof of legal necessity or benefit to the minors, so the protective scheme for minor property could not be bypassed by form of execution. The transaction was therefore not validated as a lawful alienation by the natural guardian.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:39:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (5) TMI 173 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168422</link>
      <description>Alienation of a minor&#039;s immovable property is valid only if the natural guardian acts for necessity or benefit and complies with the statutory requirement of prior court permission. A sale executed by the mother without such permission, and supported only by the father&#039;s attestation, could not be treated as a sale by the father as natural guardian. The record showed no reliable proof of legal necessity or benefit to the minors, so the protective scheme for minor property could not be bypassed by form of execution. The transaction was therefore not validated as a lawful alienation by the natural guardian.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 May 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>