https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168421 The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's murder conviction, initially confirmed by the High Court and based on strong prosecution evidence, including eyewitness testimony. Despite challenges to witness credibility and alleged discrepancies, the Court emphasized not reevaluating facts already agreed upon by lower courts. It clarified the limited scope of appeal after obtaining special leave, stressing the need for sustainable grounds from the outset. The judgment underscored the discretionary nature of granting special leave under Article 136, requiring special circumstances and substantial injustice. As such conditions were not met, the appeal was dismissed. en-us Fri, 05 May 1950 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:33:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168421 The Supreme Court upheld the appellant's murder conviction, initially confirmed by the High Court and based on strong prosecution evidence, including eyewitness testimony. Despite challenges to witness credibility and alleged discrepancies, the Court emphasized not reevaluating facts already agreed upon by lower courts. It clarified the limited scope of appeal after obtaining special leave, stressing the need for sustainable grounds from the outset. The judgment underscored the discretionary nature of granting special leave under Article 136, requiring special circumstances and substantial injustice. As such conditions were not met, the appeal was dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 05 May 1950 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168421