https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168420 Section 53A protection requires a concluded written contract, possession in part performance, an act unequivocally referable to that contract, and readiness and willingness to perform; mere continued possession by an existing mortgagee and pre-contract or equivocal payments do not satisfy part performance, so the redemption suit remained maintainable. A court auction purchaser claiming through attachment before judgment cannot enlarge the mortgagor's rights beyond the subsisting equity of redemption; where the mortgagor had already conveyed that equity to a subsequent purchaser before the auction, the auction sale did not transfer it. On the facts, the subsequent purchaser's redemption rights were restored, while the auction purchaser's claim was confined to the monetary charge directed in his favour. en-us Tue, 15 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168420 Section 53A protection requires a concluded written contract, possession in part performance, an act unequivocally referable to that contract, and readiness and willingness to perform; mere continued possession by an existing mortgagee and pre-contract or equivocal payments do not satisfy part performance, so the redemption suit remained maintainable. A court auction purchaser claiming through attachment before judgment cannot enlarge the mortgagor's rights beyond the subsisting equity of redemption; where the mortgagor had already conveyed that equity to a subsequent purchaser before the auction, the auction sale did not transfer it. On the facts, the subsequent purchaser's redemption rights were restored, while the auction purchaser's claim was confined to the monetary charge directed in his favour. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 15 Dec 1981 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168420