<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (4) TMI 111 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168419</link>
    <description>A will that required one-third of the residue to be applied to specified religious and charitable dispositions was treated as creating a trust or other legal obligation to the extent the executors assented, expressly or by conduct, to hold that property for the beneficiaries; the exemption under section 4(3)(i) therefore applied only to the portion of the estate impressed with that obligation. The court also held that section 41 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 did not permit assessment of a successor court receiver for income already received by executors or a prior receiver in earlier accounting periods, because the later receiver was not the same taxable entity and had not received those sums. The assessee succeeded on both points.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 12:14:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (4) TMI 111 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168419</link>
      <description>A will that required one-third of the residue to be applied to specified religious and charitable dispositions was treated as creating a trust or other legal obligation to the extent the executors assented, expressly or by conduct, to hold that property for the beneficiaries; the exemption under section 4(3)(i) therefore applied only to the portion of the estate impressed with that obligation. The court also held that section 41 of the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 did not permit assessment of a successor court receiver for income already received by executors or a prior receiver in earlier accounting periods, because the later receiver was not the same taxable entity and had not received those sums. The assessee succeeded on both points.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>