<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 1006 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257006</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals as non-maintainable due to an invalid Review authorization, upholding the Order-in-Original issued by the adjudicating authority. The Committee of Chief Commissioners lacked proper authorization, with one Chief Commissioner not having jurisdiction and the committee not meeting on a single day. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the cross objections filed by the Respondents, affirming the original order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2015 11:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377124" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 1006 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257006</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeals as non-maintainable due to an invalid Review authorization, upholding the Order-in-Original issued by the adjudicating authority. The Committee of Chief Commissioners lacked proper authorization, with one Chief Commissioner not having jurisdiction and the committee not meeting on a single day. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the cross objections filed by the Respondents, affirming the original order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=257006</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>