https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256998 A clear undertaking to a tribunal for repayment or compliance may be enforced through civil contempt when the person giving it remains in effective control of the company and is responsible for compliance. Later claims of resignation or transfer of management do not absolve liability where the tribunal's order continues that responsibility. Where the statutory execution mechanism is unavailable, contempt jurisdiction may be invoked to secure obedience to lawful orders. The promoter director was therefore found guilty of wilful disobedience and breach of undertaking, and the acquittal was set aside while the conviction and sentence were restored. en-us Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 18 Aug 2018 16:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256998 A clear undertaking to a tribunal for repayment or compliance may be enforced through civil contempt when the person giving it remains in effective control of the company and is responsible for compliance. Later claims of resignation or transfer of management do not absolve liability where the tribunal's order continues that responsibility. Where the statutory execution mechanism is unavailable, contempt jurisdiction may be invoked to secure obedience to lawful orders. The promoter director was therefore found guilty of wilful disobedience and breach of undertaking, and the acquittal was set aside while the conviction and sentence were restored. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256998