<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 984 - ITAT PATNA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256984</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals of the assessee for the assessment years 1999-2000 to 2005-06. It directed the deletion of additions based on differences in property valuation, rental income, unexplained cash deposits, and purchase of gold ornaments. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of credible evidence and proper consideration of the assessee&#039;s submissions, ruling that the additions were unjustified and unsustainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 10:30:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377102" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 984 - ITAT PATNA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256984</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all appeals of the assessee for the assessment years 1999-2000 to 2005-06. It directed the deletion of additions based on differences in property valuation, rental income, unexplained cash deposits, and purchase of gold ornaments. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of credible evidence and proper consideration of the assessee&#039;s submissions, ruling that the additions were unjustified and unsustainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256984</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>