<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 976 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256976</link>
    <description>The Member extended the High Court&#039;s judgment&#039;s ratio to cover transportation of guests, setting aside the impugned order. The appeals were allowed, indicating a favorable outcome for the appellants, with the judgment being dictated and pronounced in court, effectively concluding the matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2015 13:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377094" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 976 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256976</link>
      <description>The Member extended the High Court&#039;s judgment&#039;s ratio to cover transportation of guests, setting aside the impugned order. The appeals were allowed, indicating a favorable outcome for the appellants, with the judgment being dictated and pronounced in court, effectively concluding the matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>