https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168411 Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, requires a liberal construction of "sufficient cause" where the applicant shows no negligence, inaction, or lack of bona fides. The Court noted that the State acted promptly after discovering that no appeal had been filed, sought legal advice, and took steps under Article 227 before filing the regular appeals with condonation applications. Because the High Court had not properly considered the material or recorded reasons showing false explanation or negligence, the delay was condoned and the applications were allowed. en-us Tue, 14 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Feb 2015 18:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168411 Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, requires a liberal construction of "sufficient cause" where the applicant shows no negligence, inaction, or lack of bona fides. The Court noted that the State acted promptly after discovering that no appeal had been filed, sought legal advice, and took steps under Article 227 before filing the regular appeals with condonation applications. Because the High Court had not properly considered the material or recorded reasons showing false explanation or negligence, the delay was condoned and the applications were allowed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 14 Dec 1971 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168411