https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168409 Article 226 was held unavailable to challenge the Returning Officer's rejection of a nomination paper because Article 329(b) bars judicial interference in matters integral to the electoral process until the election is completed. The constitutional scheme in Part XV was treated as a complete code, and the phrase "no election shall be called in question" was read broadly to cover the entire election process, including scrutiny and rejection of nominations. The Representation of the People Act, 1951 was viewed as supporting a single post-election remedy through an election petition. The proper course, therefore, was to pursue the challenge only after the election, not by intermediate writ petition. en-us Mon, 21 Jan 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Feb 2015 16:13:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168409 Article 226 was held unavailable to challenge the Returning Officer's rejection of a nomination paper because Article 329(b) bars judicial interference in matters integral to the electoral process until the election is completed. The constitutional scheme in Part XV was treated as a complete code, and the phrase "no election shall be called in question" was read broadly to cover the entire election process, including scrutiny and rejection of nominations. The Representation of the People Act, 1951 was viewed as supporting a single post-election remedy through an election petition. The proper course, therefore, was to pursue the challenge only after the election, not by intermediate writ petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Mon, 21 Jan 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168409