https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168403 In revision under section 115 CPC, a High Court cannot convert an interlocutory ruling on a cross-examination objection into a finding on res judicata or the legal character of an earlier consent decree, because revisional power extends only to jurisdictional error or material irregularity in a matter actually decided by the subordinate court. A consent decree, being only a recorded compromise, does not by itself operate as res judicata without adjudication. An order is a "case decided" only when it determines a right or obligation in controversy; permitting a question in cross-examination does not do so. The High Court's interference was set aside as beyond section 115. en-us Tue, 29 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:03:30 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168403 In revision under section 115 CPC, a High Court cannot convert an interlocutory ruling on a cross-examination objection into a finding on res judicata or the legal character of an earlier consent decree, because revisional power extends only to jurisdictional error or material irregularity in a matter actually decided by the subordinate court. A consent decree, being only a recorded compromise, does not by itself operate as res judicata without adjudication. An order is a "case decided" only when it determines a right or obligation in controversy; permitting a question in cross-examination does not do so. The High Court's interference was set aside as beyond section 115. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 29 Apr 1969 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168403