<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (1) TMI 349 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168396</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that members of the All India Services who retired before 1.1.1973 are not entitled to claim gratuity based on revised rates specified in a particular notification. The Court upheld the validity of a specific rule regarding gratuity payments, emphasizing the distinction between pension and gratuity. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377017" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (1) TMI 349 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168396</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that members of the All India Services who retired before 1.1.1973 are not entitled to claim gratuity based on revised rates specified in a particular notification. The Court upheld the validity of a specific rule regarding gratuity payments, emphasizing the distinction between pension and gratuity. The appeal was allowed, setting aside the Tribunal&#039;s judgment without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>