<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (12) TMI 553 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168394</link>
    <description>The court found that the plaintiff and his accomplices had tampered with documents and made false statements, affecting the administration of justice. It was held that the court had jurisdiction under Section 340 Cr.P.C. to entertain the application and initiate proceedings. The court directed the Registrar to file a complaint against the plaintiff, Ashok Kapoor, and Girdhari Lal, while dismissing the application against Ms. Priya Kapoor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 11:24:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=377014" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (12) TMI 553 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168394</link>
      <description>The court found that the plaintiff and his accomplices had tampered with documents and made false statements, affecting the administration of justice. It was held that the court had jurisdiction under Section 340 Cr.P.C. to entertain the application and initiate proceedings. The court directed the Registrar to file a complaint against the plaintiff, Ashok Kapoor, and Girdhari Lal, while dismissing the application against Ms. Priya Kapoor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168394</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>