https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256972 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that handling charges collected were not liable to service tax as they were part of the value of goods sold, on which sales tax/VAT had already been paid. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between consideration for services and consideration for the supply of goods, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents like Ketan Motors Ltd. and Dynamic Motors. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order with consequential relief in accordance with the law. en-us Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 04 Sep 2015 17:40:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256972 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that handling charges collected were not liable to service tax as they were part of the value of goods sold, on which sales tax/VAT had already been paid. The Tribunal emphasized the distinction between consideration for services and consideration for the supply of goods, citing relevant legal provisions and precedents like Ketan Motors Ltd. and Dynamic Motors. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the order with consequential relief in accordance with the law. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 16 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256972