<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 967 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256967</link>
    <description>The Final Order was recalled and the appeal was restored for re-hearing. The Tribunal emphasized not penalizing the assessee for the advocate&#039;s mistake and considered the applicability of High Court judgments on interest liability regarding wrongly availed cenvat credit. The recall was granted due to the advocate&#039;s error in noting down the hearing date incorrectly, leading to non-appearance and the need for a fair reconsideration of the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 05:37:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376997" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 967 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256967</link>
      <description>The Final Order was recalled and the appeal was restored for re-hearing. The Tribunal emphasized not penalizing the assessee for the advocate&#039;s mistake and considered the applicability of High Court judgments on interest liability regarding wrongly availed cenvat credit. The recall was granted due to the advocate&#039;s error in noting down the hearing date incorrectly, leading to non-appearance and the need for a fair reconsideration of the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256967</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>