<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 958 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256958</link>
    <description>The court upheld the entitlement of the respondents to claim Cenvat credit on supplementary invoices issued by job workers. The Revenue&#039;s appeal, contending that the respondents were not entitled to the credit due to alleged suppression of facts by the job workers, was dismissed. The court found that the Revenue failed to provide evidence to support the suppression allegation, leading to the affirmation of the lower court&#039;s decision in favor of the respondents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 17:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376988" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 958 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256958</link>
      <description>The court upheld the entitlement of the respondents to claim Cenvat credit on supplementary invoices issued by job workers. The Revenue&#039;s appeal, contending that the respondents were not entitled to the credit due to alleged suppression of facts by the job workers, was dismissed. The court found that the Revenue failed to provide evidence to support the suppression allegation, leading to the affirmation of the lower court&#039;s decision in favor of the respondents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256958</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>