<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 957 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256957</link>
    <description>The Tribunal accepted the MSME report classifying imported non-alloy steel slabs as prime quality, overturning the reliance on the NML report. The appellant was granted the concessional rate of duty under Customs Notification No. 21/2002-Cus based on the MSME report&#039;s conformity with IS 2830 specifications. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with judicial directions and criticized the adjudicating authority for not fully considering the MSME report. As a result, the demands for differential duty, penalties, and confiscation of goods were deemed unsustainable, leading to the appeals being allowed and the impugned order set aside in favor of the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 11:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 957 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256957</link>
      <description>The Tribunal accepted the MSME report classifying imported non-alloy steel slabs as prime quality, overturning the reliance on the NML report. The appellant was granted the concessional rate of duty under Customs Notification No. 21/2002-Cus based on the MSME report&#039;s conformity with IS 2830 specifications. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of complying with judicial directions and criticized the adjudicating authority for not fully considering the MSME report. As a result, the demands for differential duty, penalties, and confiscation of goods were deemed unsustainable, leading to the appeals being allowed and the impugned order set aside in favor of the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256957</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>