<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 956 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256956</link>
    <description>The appeal challenged penalties imposed under Regulation 12(8) and Section 117 of the Customs Act for contraventions of various Regulations. The judge ruled that penalties under Regulation 12(8) were limited to Rs. 50,000 and penalties under Section 117 were not applicable when specific penalties were provided. The penalty under Regulation 12(8) was reduced to Rs. 50,000, and the penalty under Section 117 was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2015 15:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376986" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 956 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256956</link>
      <description>The appeal challenged penalties imposed under Regulation 12(8) and Section 117 of the Customs Act for contraventions of various Regulations. The judge ruled that penalties under Regulation 12(8) were limited to Rs. 50,000 and penalties under Section 117 were not applicable when specific penalties were provided. The penalty under Regulation 12(8) was reduced to Rs. 50,000, and the penalty under Section 117 was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256956</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>