<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 955 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256955</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the royalty paid to a related foreign supplier for reproducing imported clumps in India should not be included in the clumps&#039; value. Emphasizing the uniform application of Rule 10 of the Customs Valuation Rule, 2007, and authoritative interpretations by the World Customs Organization, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order. The decision aligns with established legal principles and precedents, supporting the appellant&#039;s argument against selectively including royalty only for related foreign suppliers in the customs valuation process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 05:35:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376985" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 955 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256955</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the royalty paid to a related foreign supplier for reproducing imported clumps in India should not be included in the clumps&#039; value. Emphasizing the uniform application of Rule 10 of the Customs Valuation Rule, 2007, and authoritative interpretations by the World Customs Organization, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order. The decision aligns with established legal principles and precedents, supporting the appellant&#039;s argument against selectively including royalty only for related foreign suppliers in the customs valuation process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256955</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>