<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 953 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256953</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the judgment under appeal was set aside. The court found the impugned order to be untenable and harassing. The respondents were ordered to pay costs to the appellant, quantified at Rs. 5,00,000. The court also suggested that the respondents could identify those responsible for the unwholesome action against the appellant and recover the amounts if they have the political will.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 13:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 953 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256953</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the judgment under appeal was set aside. The court found the impugned order to be untenable and harassing. The respondents were ordered to pay costs to the appellant, quantified at Rs. 5,00,000. The court also suggested that the respondents could identify those responsible for the unwholesome action against the appellant and recover the amounts if they have the political will.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256953</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>