<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 952 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256952</link>
    <description>The court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT (A) and ITAT orders. The Revenue failed to disprove the genuineness of the transactions and lacked evidence to support their claims, leading to the rejection of their appeal. The court emphasized the importance of proper verification and individual scrutiny of transactions, citing legal precedents to support their decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2015 05:34:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 952 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256952</link>
      <description>The court upheld the decisions of the lower authorities, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal against the CIT (A) and ITAT orders. The Revenue failed to disprove the genuineness of the transactions and lacked evidence to support their claims, leading to the rejection of their appeal. The court emphasized the importance of proper verification and individual scrutiny of transactions, citing legal precedents to support their decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256952</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>