<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 951 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256951</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the appeals, ruling against the Revenue on both the initiation of proceedings and the applicability of Section 2 (22) (e) on the merits. The judgment highlighted the importance of limitation periods in tax proceedings and the need to satisfy pre-conditions for deeming provisions to apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2015 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376981" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 951 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256951</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the appeals, ruling against the Revenue on both the initiation of proceedings and the applicability of Section 2 (22) (e) on the merits. The judgment highlighted the importance of limitation periods in tax proceedings and the need to satisfy pre-conditions for deeming provisions to apply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256951</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>