<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 944 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256944</link>
    <description>Transfer pricing comparability under TNMM must be based on functional similarity and reliable public-domain data. A captive software development services provider was distinguished from entities engaged in software product development, application support, infrastructure management, e-learning, SAP consulting, onsite services, or other materially different business models, leading to exclusion or inclusion of specific comparables on that basis. Loss by itself was not treated as a valid exclusion criterion absent abnormal circumstances or persistent losses, and software testing, verification and validation was treated as part of the software development process. A turnover-based filter introduced without prior notice or stated basis was held to require fresh consideration after hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 15:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376974" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 944 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256944</link>
      <description>Transfer pricing comparability under TNMM must be based on functional similarity and reliable public-domain data. A captive software development services provider was distinguished from entities engaged in software product development, application support, infrastructure management, e-learning, SAP consulting, onsite services, or other materially different business models, leading to exclusion or inclusion of specific comparables on that basis. Loss by itself was not treated as a valid exclusion criterion absent abnormal circumstances or persistent losses, and software testing, verification and validation was treated as part of the software development process. A turnover-based filter introduced without prior notice or stated basis was held to require fresh consideration after hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256944</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>