<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 941 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256941</link>
    <description>The ITAT set aside the penalties imposed by the AO under Section 271(1)(c) for AY 2009-10 and 2010-11, noting the lack of evidence of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The tribunal found that the revenue authorities erred in initiating penalty proceedings, as the assessee&#039;s declarations were accepted and no mala fide intent was proven. The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed, canceling the penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 11:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376971" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 941 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256941</link>
      <description>The ITAT set aside the penalties imposed by the AO under Section 271(1)(c) for AY 2009-10 and 2010-11, noting the lack of evidence of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. The tribunal found that the revenue authorities erred in initiating penalty proceedings, as the assessee&#039;s declarations were accepted and no mala fide intent was proven. The appeals filed by the assessee were allowed, canceling the penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>