<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1988 (8) TMI 414 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168391</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the eviction order against the tenant due to arrears of rent and failure to dispute standard rent within the specified period. The court emphasized the mandatory nature of passing a decree for eviction under Section 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The tenant was granted six months to vacate the premises with certain conditions to alleviate hardship.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:49:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376957" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1988 (8) TMI 414 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168391</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the eviction order against the tenant due to arrears of rent and failure to dispute standard rent within the specified period. The court emphasized the mandatory nature of passing a decree for eviction under Section 12(3)(a) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947. The tenant was granted six months to vacate the premises with certain conditions to alleviate hardship.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 1988 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168391</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>