<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (9) TMI 54 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168389</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Act XIII of 1960, ruling that the classification between different municipal areas was justifiable and did not violate Article 14. The Court also determined that the withdrawal of statutory rights under the Principal Act by the 1960 Act did not infringe upon the appellants&#039; fundamental rights under Articles 19(1)(f) and 31(1) of the Constitution. As a result, the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:58:22 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376951" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (9) TMI 54 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168389</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court upheld the constitutional validity of Act XIII of 1960, ruling that the classification between different municipal areas was justifiable and did not violate Article 14. The Court also determined that the withdrawal of statutory rights under the Principal Act by the 1960 Act did not infringe upon the appellants&#039; fundamental rights under Articles 19(1)(f) and 31(1) of the Constitution. As a result, the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168389</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>