<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1997 (5) TMI 422 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168386</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, finding it improper for entertaining a new plea in the second appeal without complying with Section 100 C.P.C. The High Court&#039;s failure to formulate a substantial question of law and provide the opposite party a fair opportunity rendered its decision illegal. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court&#039;s decision and emphasizing the necessity of complying with the provisions of Section 100 C.P.C.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:12:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376950" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1997 (5) TMI 422 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168386</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court set aside the High Court&#039;s judgment, finding it improper for entertaining a new plea in the second appeal without complying with Section 100 C.P.C. The High Court&#039;s failure to formulate a substantial question of law and provide the opposite party a fair opportunity rendered its decision illegal. The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, overturning the High Court&#039;s decision and emphasizing the necessity of complying with the provisions of Section 100 C.P.C.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 1997 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>