<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1950 (11) TMI 14 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168388</link>
    <description>SC reaffirmed that an appellate court should be slow to interfere with a trial court&#039;s finding based on oral testimony, especially where the judge observed the witnesses directly. Reversal is justified only if the evidence as a whole cannot reasonably support the finding, or if proved circumstances create compelling improbabilities. Applying that principle, the trial court&#039;s conclusion that the mortgage deed was duly attested at execution was supported by the record and consistent with the probabilities of the case. The High Court had insufficient grounds to disturb that finding, so the trial court&#039;s attestation finding was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 15:31:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376948" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1950 (11) TMI 14 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168388</link>
      <description>SC reaffirmed that an appellate court should be slow to interfere with a trial court&#039;s finding based on oral testimony, especially where the judge observed the witnesses directly. Reversal is justified only if the evidence as a whole cannot reasonably support the finding, or if proved circumstances create compelling improbabilities. Applying that principle, the trial court&#039;s conclusion that the mortgage deed was duly attested at execution was supported by the record and consistent with the probabilities of the case. The High Court had insufficient grounds to disturb that finding, so the trial court&#039;s attestation finding was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 1950 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168388</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>