<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1978 (4) TMI 233 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168384</link>
    <description>Section 151 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1954 was treated as governing succession to a tenure-holder&#039;s interest, but its reference to &quot;personal law&quot; was read as the law in force when succession opened, not the law existing when the Code was enacted. On that basis, the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 applied at the female holder&#039;s death and the saving clause in section 4(2) did not exclude it. For property inherited from a husband by a female intestate dying issueless, section 15(2)(b) read with section 16 deems the husband to have died immediately after her death, so his heirs are determined at that time. The respondent, as a Class II heir, ranked ahead of the agnates.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2015 11:48:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376936" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1978 (4) TMI 233 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168384</link>
      <description>Section 151 of the Madhya Pradesh Land Revenue Code, 1954 was treated as governing succession to a tenure-holder&#039;s interest, but its reference to &quot;personal law&quot; was read as the law in force when succession opened, not the law existing when the Code was enacted. On that basis, the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 applied at the female holder&#039;s death and the saving clause in section 4(2) did not exclude it. For property inherited from a husband by a female intestate dying issueless, section 15(2)(b) read with section 16 deems the husband to have died immediately after her death, so his heirs are determined at that time. The respondent, as a Class II heir, ranked ahead of the agnates.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 1978 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>