<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1963 (10) TMI 27 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168380</link>
    <description>An assessing officer&#039;s pre assessment order refusing exemption that merely records and enforces an external administrative opinion is vitiated by extraneous influence and by making an advance determination outside the statutory assessment process; certiorari quashed that order. However, an assessing officer retains jurisdiction to initiate enquiries and require returns and to determine exemption claims in assessment proceedings after factual inquiry into application of income and the trust&#039;s conduct; mere assertion of exemption does not oust that jurisdiction and no jurisdictional error was shown to justify prohibition, so prohibition petitions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 May 2015 10:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376929" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1963 (10) TMI 27 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168380</link>
      <description>An assessing officer&#039;s pre assessment order refusing exemption that merely records and enforces an external administrative opinion is vitiated by extraneous influence and by making an advance determination outside the statutory assessment process; certiorari quashed that order. However, an assessing officer retains jurisdiction to initiate enquiries and require returns and to determine exemption claims in assessment proceedings after factual inquiry into application of income and the trust&#039;s conduct; mere assertion of exemption does not oust that jurisdiction and no jurisdictional error was shown to justify prohibition, so prohibition petitions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Oct 1963 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>