https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168379 The appellants, former mortgagees in possession, were denied the benefit of Section 4A of the Kerala Land Reforms Act by the High Court and lower courts. They failed to establish continuous possession for fifty years preceding 1.1.1970 as required by the law. The courts held that the appellants' status as mortgagees in possession ceased before the crucial date, rendering them ineligible for deemed tenancy under Section 4A. The appeals were dismissed, and no costs were awarded to the appellants. en-us Wed, 11 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 04 May 2015 10:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168379 The appellants, former mortgagees in possession, were denied the benefit of Section 4A of the Kerala Land Reforms Act by the High Court and lower courts. They failed to establish continuous possession for fifty years preceding 1.1.1970 as required by the law. The courts held that the appellants' status as mortgagees in possession ceased before the crucial date, rendering them ineligible for deemed tenancy under Section 4A. The appeals were dismissed, and no costs were awarded to the appellants. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 11 Sep 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=168379