<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 926 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256926</link>
    <description>Where 90% of a refund had already been granted as provisional refund, the remaining balance could not be denied merely on limitation grounds. The unpaid amount was directed to be released by adjustment against future tax liability, because the taxpayer expressly waived interest and the Revenue accepted that such adjustment would not prejudice its interests. In these circumstances, the balance refund had to be paid, and no interest was payable in view of the waiver.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376913" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 926 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256926</link>
      <description>Where 90% of a refund had already been granted as provisional refund, the remaining balance could not be denied merely on limitation grounds. The unpaid amount was directed to be released by adjustment against future tax liability, because the taxpayer expressly waived interest and the Revenue accepted that such adjustment would not prejudice its interests. In these circumstances, the balance refund had to be paid, and no interest was payable in view of the waiver.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256926</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>