<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (2) TMI 922 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256922</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, a cement manufacturer, regarding the denial of Cenvat credit on capital goods and rent-a-cab service. The appellant successfully argued that they could claim credit based on triplicate invoices for capital goods and for the rent-a-cab service used in their manufacturing business. The Tribunal overturned the denial of credit, citing relevant rules and legal precedents, and set aside the adjudication order confirming the demand for duty, interest, and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2015 16:39:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=376909" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (2) TMI 922 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256922</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal in favor of the appellant, a cement manufacturer, regarding the denial of Cenvat credit on capital goods and rent-a-cab service. The appellant successfully argued that they could claim credit based on triplicate invoices for capital goods and for the rent-a-cab service used in their manufacturing business. The Tribunal overturned the denial of credit, citing relevant rules and legal precedents, and set aside the adjudication order confirming the demand for duty, interest, and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=256922</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>